Alert Icon ALERT
Ok Icon
FullSpecs.net Logo
 
Skullcandy Riff On-Ear Headphones
Rs.2,999.00

Philips TAH3155BK/97
Rs.3,000.00
Brand
Skullcandy
Philips
Model No
Riff On-Ear Headphones
TAH3155BK/97
Wired / Wireless
Wired Headphone Specification
Wired Headphone Specification
Headphone Type
On Ear
On Ear
 
Magnet Type
Dynamic
Neodymium
Driver Diameter
40 mm
32 mm
Impedance
32 Ohm
32 ohm
Sensitivity
98dB
106 dB
Frequency Response
20 Hz - 20000 Hz
20 Hz - 20000 kHz
Maximum Power Input
1 mW
40 mW
Noise Cancelling
NA
Passive
 
Available Colors
Black, White, Blue, Red, Green, Grey
Black
Connector Plating
3.5 mm
3.5 mm stereo Chrome-Plated Jack
Cable
Tangle Resistant Cable
Tangle Resistant Cable
Weight
151 gm
132 gm
Other Features
Refined Acoustics.
Built-in Microphone.
Call and Track Control.
Ultra-Durable Headband.
Lightweight and Comfortable.
Collapsible, Flat-Folding Design
Powerful 32 mm neodymium drivers.
Inward folding design for easy portability.
Inline remote. Easily control music and calls.
Lightweight, adjustable cushioned headband.
Great sound isolation from the closed-back design.
• Soft ear cups that can be angled for maximum comfort.
USB in cable with computer firmware as professional headset.

Compare Skullcandy Riff On-Ear Headphones with:

Compare Philips TAH3155BK/97 with:

Key Differences

Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices. Philips TAH3155BK/97 and Skullcandy Riff On-Ear Headphones are premium wireless headphones designed to deliver high-quality sound along with advanced features like noise cancellation and long battery life. The driver size differs between the two (32 mm vs 40 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Philips TAH3155BK/97 and Skullcandy Riff On-Ear Headphones offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Passive vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Impedance levels vary (32 ohm vs 32 Ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. There is a noticeable difference in weight (132 gm vs 151 gm), which may affect comfort during extended use. The frequency response differs (20 Hz - 20000 kHz vs 20 Hz - 20000 Hz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel. In general, both options are suitable for everyday use including music, calls, travel, and work-from-home scenarios.

Verdict: Both models are competitive, and your decision should be based on your usage needs and preferred features.

Top Differences

  • Noise Cancelling: Passive vs NA
  • Driver Size: 32 mm vs 40 mm
  • Weight: 132 gm vs 151 gm