Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs RHA TrueControl ANC – Detailed Specs Comparison (2026)

Closed design. Total battery life up to 38 hours. Six microphones for best speech quality. Customised settings via the beyerdynamic app. Active noise cancellation and transparency mode. Splash-proof according to IP54 certification and sweat resistant. Qi-compatible charging case for wireless charging and fast charging. Wearing detection (automatic playback / stop when inserting / removing the earphones). Multi-point BluetoothÂ® 5.3. for simultaneous connection of multiple BluetoothÂ® devices.

3 Year International Warranty. Control your environment with Ambient modes. Sweatproof and water resistant to IPX4 for active use. 5 hours of audio per charge, 20 hours total with wireless charging case. Tune the EQ to your preference with the RHA Connect app for Apple & Android. Developed to work with all digital assistants, including Google Assistant and Siri, Hear what you want to hear with unprecedented ANC & adjustable ambient modes. Finest BluetoothÂ® sound quality, optimised by QualCommÂ® cVcâ„¢, aptXâ„¢, & AAC. Internal testing against competitor products showed TrueControl ANC to have superior attenuation on average across audible frequencies. Wireless audio deserves wireless charging. The TrueControl case is compatible with all wireless chargers, with a back-up USB-C cable included too.

RHA TrueControl ANC and Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Active vs Active Noise Cancellation), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. The driver size differs between the two (6 mm vs 10 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. From a usability standpoint, both models provide a reliable and premium headphone experience. The frequency response differs (10 Hz - 20000 Hz vs 20Hz - 40KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. RHA TrueControl ANC and Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 are premium wireless headphones designed to deliver high-quality sound along with advanced features like noise cancellation and long battery life. There is a noticeable difference in weight (8 gm vs 51.33 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Battery life varies between the two (20 Hours vs 10 / 28 / 38 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. RHA TrueControl ANC uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 supports Bluetooth 5.3, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Impedance levels vary (32 Ohm vs 32 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices.

Verdict: Choosing between RHA TrueControl ANC and Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features.

Top Differences

Battery Life: 20 Hours vs 10 / 28 / 38 Hours
Driver Size: 6 mm vs 10 mm
Bluetooth: 5.0 vs 5.3
Weight: 8 gm vs 51.33 GM

Compare Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 with:

Compare RHA TrueControl ANC with:

Top Differences