| Model No |
VMR40FH17XAH |
LEO39FD |
| TV Type |
LED TV |
LED TV |
| Screen Size |
39 Inch (99 cm) |
39 Inch (99 cm) |
| Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
1920 x 1080 |
| Aspect Ratio |
16:9 |
16:9 |
| Motion Rate |
NA |
NA |
| Viewing Angle |
178 / 178 degrees |
178 / 178 degrees |
| USB |
| USB Version |
: 2.0 & 3.0 |
| Supported Audio Formats |
: mp3, wav, mp4, wma |
| Supported Video Formats |
: mp4, avi, mkv, asf, wmv, 3gp, mov, webm |
| Supported Picture Formats |
: jpg |
|
| USB Version |
: 2.0 & 3.0 |
| Supported Audio Formats |
: MP3, AAC, WMA |
| Supported Video Formats |
: MKV, DivX, MP4, AVI, ASF, MOV, FLV, DAT, VOB |
| Supported Picture Formats |
: JPG |
|
| Video |
| Contrast Ratio |
: Mega Contrast Ratio |
| Display Colours |
: 16.7 Million |
| Selectable Picture Modes |
: Hi-Bright,Vivid, Sports, Cinema,User |
| Panel Type |
: Full HD |
| Series |
: Liquid Luminous |
| Brightness |
: 450 |
| DCI - Dynamic Contrast Improvement |
: Yes |
| DCDI - Directional Correlation Deinterlacing |
: Yes |
|
| Selectable Picture Modes |
: Vivid / Cinema / News / Sports / Normal |
| Video Processing |
: SRV Engine |
| Dynamic contrast ratio |
: 3000000 : 1 |
| Flesh Tone Adjust |
: Off, Low, Medium, High |
| Noise Reduction |
: Off, Low, Medium, High |
| Display Color |
: 16.7 Million |
| Colour System |
: Pal / Secam / Auto |
| Backlight Module |
: EDGE LED |
|
| Audio |
| Output power (RMS) |
: 2 x 10 Watts |
| Auto Volume Leveller |
: Yes |
| Selectable Sound Modes |
: User / Speech / Standard / Music |
| Graphic Equalizer |
: Yes 5 Band |
| DNR |
: Yes |
| Soen Sound/ Boom Box |
: Soen Sound |
|
| Audio Output |
: 2 x 10 Watts |
| Sound Modes |
: Movie, Music, Flat, Normal |
| Surround Sound |
: Yes |
| Equalizer |
: Yes |
|
| Connectivity Options |
| USB |
: 3 |
| HDMI |
: 4 |
| RF IN |
: 1 |
| AV IN |
: 1 |
| DVD Compatibility (YPbPr/YCbCr) |
: 1 |
| PC Audio IN |
: 1 |
| PC(VGA IN) |
: 1 |
|
| USB |
: 2 |
| HDMI |
: 2 |
| Composite Video In |
: 2 |
| Component Video (Y/Pb/Pr) In |
: 1 |
| VGA |
: 1 |
| AV Out |
: Yes |
| PC Audio In |
: 1 |
|
| Other Features |
| Mosaic PIP |
: Yes |
| Channel Guide |
: Yes |
| Tickers |
: Yes |
| Favourites |
: Yes |
| Active Services |
: Yes |
| d2h Movies |
: Yes |
| Radio |
: Yes |
| Setup |
: Yes |
| PVR |
: Yes |
|
| USB Play |
: Movie, Music, Jpeg |
| iPLAYON ( USB Quick View ) |
: Yes |
| OSD Languages |
: English / Arabic / Russian |
| Hotel Mode |
: Optional |
| Wake Up Timer |
: Yes |
| Others |
: Alarm |
| Design |
: Slim |
|
| General Details |
| Power Supply |
: 100-240VAC, 50/60Hz |
| Power Consumption |
: 100 Watts |
| Net Weight without stand |
: 7.9 Kg |
| Net Weight with stand |
: 8.5 Kg |
|
| Power Supply |
: 100 240VAC ; 50Hz / 60HZ |
| Power Consumption |
: 81 watts |
| Power Consumption (Stand-by) |
: 0.3 Watt |
| Weight with Stand |
: 13.25 Kg |
|
| Supplied Accessories |
| Remote Handset |
: Yes |
| Battery Cell |
: Yes |
| User's Guide Book |
: Yes |
|
| Remote Control |
: Yes |
| Battery Cell |
: Yes |
| Wall Mount |
: Yes |
| Instruction Manual |
: Yes |
| Table Top |
: Yes |
|
|
Compare Videocon VMR40FH17XAH with:
|
Compare Onida LEO39FD with:
|
|
Both TVs come with smart platforms that support popular streaming apps and voice control features. Both TVs come in similar screen sizes, making them suitable for comparable viewing setups and room environments. Both TVs provide standard built-in audio performance suitable for regular usage, though external speakers can enhance the experience. Both TVs offer adequate brightness levels suitable for most indoor lighting conditions. Both models support 1920 x 1080 resolution, ensuring sharp picture quality with detailed visuals for movies, shows, and gaming. Overall, both models are capable choices in their segment, offering a balance between performance, features, and usability. Both TVs provide decent motion handling, making them suitable for everyday viewing including sports and action content. Videocon VMR40FH17XAH and Onida LEO39FD are two competitive smart TVs offering a mix of display performance, smart features, and overall value for different types of users. Verdict: Both models offer good value, and the better option depends on your specific requirements and viewing preferences.
|
|
ALERT
