
![]() Unix UX-490 Boom Rs.2,999.00 | ![]() Philips TAT1169BL Rs.2,999.00 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key DifferencesBoth models provide a wide frequency range, delivering a balanced audio experience across different types of content. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. Philips TAT1169BL uses Bluetooth 5.3 while Unix UX-490 Boom supports Bluetooth 5.1, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Battery life varies between the two (7 + 48 Hours vs 22 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. The driver size differs between the two (12 mm vs 12.5 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. If you're comparing Philips TAT1169BL and Unix UX-490 Boom, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Impedance levels vary (16 Ohms vs 50 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Philips TAT1169BL and Unix UX-490 Boom offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Environmental Noise Cancelling vs Active Noise Cancelling), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. There is a noticeable difference in weight (38 GM vs 100 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Verdict: Both headphones offer strong performance, and the right choice depends on your priorities such as battery life, comfort, and noise cancellation. Top Differences
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All rights reserved © 2026 FullSpecs.net Developed & maintained by Myzow Solutions, LLP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||