Battery life varies between the two (24 Hours vs 5 + 10 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. Skullcandy Sesh Evo uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Philips TAT1138WT supports Bluetooth 5.3, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. The frequency response differs (20 Hz - 20000 Hz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. There is a noticeable difference in weight (63.5 gm vs 37 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. If you're comparing Skullcandy Sesh Evo and Philips TAT1138WT, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Impedance levels vary (32 Ohm vs 16 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. The driver size differs between the two (6 mm vs 13 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Skullcandy Sesh Evo and Philips TAT1138WT offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Ambient vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise.
Verdict: Both models are competitive, and your decision should be based on your usage needs and preferred features.
Top Differences
- Battery Life: 24 Hours vs 5 + 10 Hours
- Noise Cancelling: Ambient vs NA
- Driver Size: 6 mm vs 13 mm
- Bluetooth: 5.0 vs 5.3
- Weight: 63.5 gm vs 37 GM