If you're comparing Sennheiser RS 175-U and Skullcandy SESH® ANC, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Battery life varies between the two (18 Hours vs ANC On 6 Hours, 26 Hours In Case - ANC Off 7 Hours, 37 Hours In Case.), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. The driver size differs between the two (NA vs 12 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. Sennheiser RS 175-U uses Bluetooth NA while Skullcandy SESH® ANC supports Bluetooth 5.2, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Impedance levels vary (32 ohm vs 32Ω ± 15% Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. There is a noticeable difference in weight (310 gm vs 63.5 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Sennheiser RS 175-U and Skullcandy SESH® ANC offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Active vs Active Noise Cancelling), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. The frequency response differs (17 Hz - 22000 Hz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs.
Verdict: Choosing between Sennheiser RS 175-U and Skullcandy SESH® ANC depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features.
Top Differences
- Battery Life: 18 Hours vs ANC On 6 Hours, 26 Hours In Case - ANC Off 7 Hours, 37 Hours In Case.
- Driver Size: NA vs 12 mm
- Bluetooth: NA vs 5.2
- Weight: 310 gm vs 63.5 GM
- Impedance: 32 ohm Vs 32Ω ± 15% Ohms