SHURE SRH1840 vs Beyerdynamic DT 290 MK II – Key Differences & Best Choice (2026)

TTwo-Year limited warranty Individually tested and serialized. Legendary Shure durability withstands the rigors of everyday use. Optimized for connection to external headphone amplification systems. Replaceable velour ear pads with high-density, slow-recovery foam for exceptional comfort. Ergonomic dual-frame, padded headband is lightweight and fully adjustable for hours of listening comfort. Open-back, circumaural design for exceptionally natural sound, wide stereo image, and increased depth of field. Lightweight construction featuring aircraft-grade aluminum alloy yoke and stainless-steel grilles for enhanced durability. Dual-exit cables with gold-plated MMCX connectors provide secure connection and detachability for easy storage or replacement. Individually matched 40 mm neodymium drivers for unparalleled acoustic performance with smooth, extended highs and accurate bass.

Made in Germany. Available Variations DT 290 MK II / 80 ohms DT 290 MK II / 250 ohms Flexible, swivelling gooseneck for optimum positioning. Headset with dynamic microphone for broadcast and intercom ( closed ). High-performance neodymium magnet system for excellent playback precision. High-quality dynamic microphone with hypercardioid characteristic ( high feedback prevention ). All versions of the DT 290 are supplied without a connection cable. Please order the desired connection cable at the same time.

Key Differences

The frequency response differs (10 - 30.000 Hz vs 10 Hz - 30000 Hz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Beyerdynamic DT 290 MK II and SHURE SRH1840 offer different noise cancellation capabilities (NA vs CVC), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Impedance levels vary (250 ohm vs 65 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel. In general, both options are suitable for everyday use including music, calls, travel, and work-from-home scenarios. The driver size differs between the two (NA vs 40 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. If you're comparing Beyerdynamic DT 290 MK II and SHURE SRH1840, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. There is a noticeable difference in weight (240 g vs 268 Gm), which may affect comfort during extended use. Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices.

Verdict: Choosing between Beyerdynamic DT 290 MK II and SHURE SRH1840 depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features.

Top Differences

Noise Cancelling: NA vs CVC
Driver Size: NA vs 40 mm
Weight: 240 g vs 268 Gm
Impedance: 250 ohm vs 65 ohm

Compare SHURE SRH1840 with:

Compare Beyerdynamic DT 290 MK II with:

Key Differences

Top Differences