Sennheiser RS 120 II vs Nokia E3500 – Which One Should You Buy? (2026)

2-year warranty. Appealing, modern design. Range of up to 100 metres (300 feet). Optional wall mounting of transmitter possible. Rechargeable NiMH batteries included (size: AAA). Open, stereo, supraaural, wireless RF headphone system. Suitable for all types of modern music and TV applications. Wireless freedom with reception through walls and ceilings. Very lightweight headphones, extremely comfortable to wear. Detailed, analytical sound reproduction with strong bass response. Transmitter with metal cradle for storing and recharging the headphones. Control elements conveniently positioned to provide easy, intuitive operation.

Be connected everywhere. Up to 25 hours* of sound. Listen to your surroundings. "Hey Google, take me home". Stay alert - Hear your outside surroundings with Ambient Mode. Say hello to superior call performance. The Qualcomm cVc - Clear Voice. Weatherproof to IPX5 is rated at Level 5 protection against damage from sweat The earphones are ultra-lightweight at just five grams - the same weight as a piece of A4 paper. Uninterrupted listening - Qualcomm aptX offers consistent high-quality and low latency audio. Dual microphones and Qualcomm cVc technology lessen background noise and enhance voice quality

Nokia E3500 and Sennheiser RS 120 II are well-known options in the wireless headphone segment, offering a balance of audio quality, battery performance, and smart features. Nokia E3500 and Sennheiser RS 120 II offer different noise cancellation capabilities (CVC vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. The driver size differs between the two (10 mm vs NA), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Battery life varies between the two (25 Hours vs 20 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. There is a noticeable difference in weight (32 gm vs 200 gm), which may affect comfort during extended use. The frequency response differs (20 Hz to 20000 kHz vs 22 Hz - 19500 Hz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. Impedance levels vary (16 ohm vs 24 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Nokia E3500 uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Sennheiser RS 120 II supports Bluetooth NA, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency.

Verdict: Choosing between Nokia E3500 and Sennheiser RS 120 II depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features.

Top Differences

Battery Life: 25 Hours vs 20 Hours
Noise Cancelling: CVC vs NA
Driver Size: 10 mm vs NA
Bluetooth: 5.0 vs NA
Weight: 32 gm vs 200 gm

Compare Sennheiser RS 120 II with:

Compare Nokia E3500 with:

Top Differences