Nokia E3500 vs Sennheiser RS 120 II – Which One Should You Buy? (2026)

Be connected everywhere. Up to 25 hours* of sound. Listen to your surroundings. "Hey Google, take me home". Stay alert - Hear your outside surroundings with Ambient Mode. Say hello to superior call performance. The Qualcomm cVc - Clear Voice. Weatherproof to IPX5 is rated at Level 5 protection against damage from sweat The earphones are ultra-lightweight at just five grams - the same weight as a piece of A4 paper. Uninterrupted listening - Qualcomm aptX offers consistent high-quality and low latency audio. Dual microphones and Qualcomm cVc technology lessen background noise and enhance voice quality

2-year warranty. Appealing, modern design. Range of up to 100 metres (300 feet). Optional wall mounting of transmitter possible. Rechargeable NiMH batteries included (size: AAA). Open, stereo, supraaural, wireless RF headphone system. Suitable for all types of modern music and TV applications. Wireless freedom with reception through walls and ceilings. Very lightweight headphones, extremely comfortable to wear. Detailed, analytical sound reproduction with strong bass response. Transmitter with metal cradle for storing and recharging the headphones. Control elements conveniently positioned to provide easy, intuitive operation.

The driver size differs between the two (10 mm vs NA), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. If you're comparing Nokia E3500 and Sennheiser RS 120 II, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Nokia E3500 uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Sennheiser RS 120 II supports Bluetooth NA, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Nokia E3500 and Sennheiser RS 120 II offer different noise cancellation capabilities (CVC vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Impedance levels vary (16 ohm vs 24 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. There is a noticeable difference in weight (32 gm vs 200 gm), which may affect comfort during extended use. Battery life varies between the two (25 Hours vs 20 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. From a usability standpoint, both models provide a reliable and premium headphone experience. The frequency response differs (20 Hz to 20000 kHz vs 22 Hz - 19500 Hz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs.

Verdict: Choosing between Nokia E3500 and Sennheiser RS 120 II depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features.

Top Differences

Battery Life: 25 Hours vs 20 Hours
Noise Cancelling: CVC vs NA
Driver Size: 10 mm vs NA
Bluetooth: 5.0 vs NA
Weight: 32 gm vs 200 gm

Compare Nokia E3500 with:

Compare Sennheiser RS 120 II with:

Top Differences