Nokia E3100 vs Philips TAT1150BK – Detailed Specs Comparison (2026)

Big on sound, low on bulk. Voice control on demand. Perfect pairing in an instant. Made for those on the move. Add some color to your sound. Color your moment with music. The IPX3 weatherproof design gives you added protection from sweat and water.

Powerful Drivers : 13mm Neodymium drivers delivers deep bass and rich sound quality. Up To 55 Hours Playtime and Fast Charging : Enjoy uninterrupted music with quick charging ensures minimal downtime. Bluetooth 5.3 and Low Latency Mode : Latest BT 5.3 for seamless connectivity with ultra-low latency, perfect for gaming and streaming. Active Noise Cancelling : Experience up to 32dB noise cancellation for immersive sound, with Quad Mic Environmental Noise Cancellation for crystal-clear calls. Rapid Charging: Just 10 minutes of charging delivers an impressive 150 minutes of playback, ensuring you stay connected and entertained without long wait times. Ideal for busy lifestyles, this quick power boost keeps your devices ready when you need them most.

Key Differences

The driver size differs between the two (6 mm vs 13 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Nokia E3100 and Philips TAT1150BK offer different noise cancellation capabilities (NA vs Active Noise Cancelling), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. There is a noticeable difference in weight (30 gm vs 43 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. If you're comparing Nokia E3100 and Philips TAT1150BK, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. The frequency response differs (20 Hz to 20000 kHz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Battery life varies between the two (10 Hours vs 55 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. Nokia E3100 uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Philips TAT1150BK supports Bluetooth 5.3, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Impedance levels vary (32 ohm vs 32 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience.

Verdict: Both models are competitive, and your decision should be based on your usage needs and preferred features.

Top Differences

Battery Life: 10 Hours vs 55 Hours
Noise Cancelling: NA vs Active Noise Cancelling
Driver Size: 6 mm vs 13 mm
Bluetooth: 5.0 vs 5.3
Weight: 30 gm vs 43 GM

Compare Nokia E3100 with:

Compare Philips TAT1150BK with:

Key Differences

Top Differences