Alert Icon ALERT
Ok Icon
FullSpecs.net Logo
 
JBL TUNE 290
Rs.1,699.00

Sennheiser HD 202-II
Rs.1,700.00
Brand
JBL
Sennheiser
Model No
TUNE 290
HD 202-II
Wired / Wireless
Wired Headphone Specification
Wired Headphone Specification
Headphone Type
In Ear
Over Ear
 
Magnet Type
Dynamic
Neodymium
Driver Diameter
8.7 mm
40 mm
Impedance
16 ohm
32 ohms
Sensitivity
102 ±3dB
115 dB
Frequency Response
20 Hz - 20000 kHz
18 - 18000 Hz
Maximum Power Input
NA
NA
Noise Cancelling
NA
No
 
Available Colors
Black, White, Gold
Black
Connector Plating
3.5 mm
3.5 mm Stereo Plug
Cable
Tangle- Free Flat Cable
3 meters Y-Type cable
Weight
71 gm
130 g (without cable)
Other Features
JBL Pure Bass sound.
Soft carrying pouch.
Premium Aluminium Build.
Tangle-free. Boredom-free.
One year manufacturer’s warranty
One button remote with microphone.
Quick Launch Access to Google Assistant / Siri.
A flat cable that’s durable and won’t tangle up in knots.
The earpiece housing is crafted from aluminium, making it lightweight but rugged.
- Total Harmonic Distortion (THD): 0.5 %
- Cable take-up lets you adjust the headphone cable to the required length
- Replaceable leatherette ear pads

Compare JBL TUNE 290 with:

Compare Sennheiser HD 202-II with:

Key Differences

The frequency response differs (18 - 18000 Hz vs 20 Hz - 20000 kHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Sennheiser HD 202-II and JBL TUNE 290 are well-known options in the wireless headphone segment, offering a balance of audio quality, battery performance, and smart features. There is a noticeable difference in weight (130 g (without cable) vs 71 gm), which may affect comfort during extended use. Impedance levels vary (32 ohms vs 16 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Sennheiser HD 202-II and JBL TUNE 290 offer different noise cancellation capabilities (No vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. In general, both options are suitable for everyday use including music, calls, travel, and work-from-home scenarios. The driver size differs between the two (40 mm vs 8.7 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel.

Verdict: Both models are competitive, and your decision should be based on your usage needs and preferred features.

Top Differences

  • Noise Cancelling: No vs NA
  • Driver Size: 40 mm vs 8.7 mm
  • Weight: 130 g (without cable) vs 71 gm
  • Impedance: 32 ohms vs 16 ohm